Sample Letter
Donald & Peggy Zirbel
Canby, Oregon
Mr.
Denis Pavlich, VP of External and Legal Affairs, UBC;
Mr.
Johnny Carline, CAO, the Greater Vancouver Regional District;
Mr.
Hugh Kellas, Manager, GVRD Policy and Planning;
Members,
the GVRD-UBC Joint Committee;
Members,
the GVRD Board of Directors;
Members,
the UBC Board of Governors;
Mr.
Ed Andrusiak, Manager GVRD Parks;
Mr.
Mitch Sokalski, Manager, West Area Parks, and
GVRD
Policy and Planning Department
Via
e-mail to: judyw@wreckbeach.org
October 23, 2005
Dear
Decision Makers and Stewards of UBC and GVRD:
Re:
Marine Residential Towers.
We wish to express
our disappointment and opposition over the current proposal to push forward
with the construction of the UBC’s Phase II towers. As frequent visitors
to British Columbia from the northwestern United States,
we are dumfounded over the philosophy that seems to be driving the towers
proposal. This decision not only conflicts with Vancouver’s reputation as one of the
world’s most beautiful cities; it directly threatens it.
The natural setting provided by Wreck
Beach, and the mouth of the Fraser River,
are in part what bring us back time after time. And it is clear that we
aren’t alone; it’s impossible to research tourism information for Vancouver without quickly coming across images of Wreck Beach
and its tidal flats and green cliffs, with flocks of migratory waterfowl adding
to the beauty of the wilderness. It’s worth an entire day at
water’s edge just to watch an eagle with its young, soaring over the
flats and adjacent land. It is admirable to find that such a developed
metropolitan area as Vancouver
also respects and values the natural beauty of its own region, and provides its
inhabitants and visitors with opportunities to enjoy it.
Now, those same inhabitants and visitors are facing the loss of one of
the very things that draws them to Vancouver
and the surrounding area. Through ignorance, greed and short-sightedness, the
world is losing its natural beauty at frightening speed. The United States is no exception, and it’s
one of the reasons so many U.S.
tourist dollars change hands in British Columbia
and other parts of Canada.
Ask the average U.S. citizen
what makes Canada
different from our own country, and the answer is most often “the natural
beauty up there”. Vancouver sits at the
top of a tourist gateway, accommodating over a half million U.S. citizens
each month. Besides the loss of scenic beauty, the environmental destruction of
the Wreck Beach area, as a direct result of the towers
construction at their proposed height, is bound to negatively impact these
numbers. Not only will the region’s natural beauty be forever marred, so
will its reputation among the environmental and tourist communities of the
world.
Once it’s done, it’s done. The time for damage control will
have long passed, and the countless numbers of visitors who are watching the
towers issue unfold will pass as well. We appeal to you to reconsider the
long-term consequences of the decisions being made. Over time, the number of
bodies that the towers are expected to accommodate cannot possibly approach the
number of those who will find other venues in which to spend their tourist
dollars and hard-earned vacation time. This letter speaks for two of those
bodies, but represents many, many more.
Thank you for your consideration; we await, with significant personal
interest, the final resolution of this issue.
Sincerely yours,
Donald and Peggy Zirbel
Canby, Oregon